Skip to content
emeli paulo

Projects & Impact

Work that brings people, ideas and systems together.

From public campaigns and wellbeing education to workplace culture and community co-design. Selected projects, the people behind them, and the practice that connects the work.

Landmark projects

Culture & community mobilisation

Make Poverty History

Melbourne concerts & ZeroSeven Roadtrip

Co-created the Make Poverty History concerts in Melbourne and the ZeroSeven Roadtrip, bringing music, community and social action into a shared public experience.

Emeli's role: Co-creator

Explore the roadtrip archive

Wellbeing education & coaching

Collective Potential

From a social enterprise to a body of practice

Built Collective Potential's wellbeing education and coaching programs, reaching 10,000+ customers and participants. An impact report by Dr Peggy Kern at the University of Melbourne brings a research perspective to this work.

Emeli's role: Founder & program builder

View the impact report

Scale & reach across my practice

1M+
People reached
Across community, campaigns and education
10,000+
Workshops & facilitated experiences
Across Emeli's practice
1,200+
Programs designed & delivered
Across Emeli's practice
500+
Organisations, brands & institutions
Partnered with across Emeli's practice
25+
Years of practice
Across human systems and community design

Career-wide reach and delivery, not measures of evaluated outcomes. Emeli’s LinkedIn profile (opens in a new tab)

10,000+

Collective Potential customers & participants

Practice meets research

Learning from what people experience.

The Collective Potential impact report by Dr Peggy Kern at the University of Melbourne sits alongside the lived experience of participants. Reach tells one part of the story; the report offers a closer look at the work.

Selected client work

Different settings. Human challenges.

Government & community · Client work

Community of Practice & lived-experience workforce learning

Facilitated cross-sector collaboration across government, service providers and community partners, alongside bespoke learning to help staff integrate lived experience into everyday practice. Network transition planning saw six partner organisations volunteer to host future sessions beyond initial program funding.

Worked with
Government departments, community service providers, local partners and staff
What was delivered
Community of Practice facilitation, co-created workforce learning modules, participant workbooks and network transition planning

Department of Families, Fairness and Housing (DFFH) · Paving the Way Forward

Hospitality · Client work

Values into behaviours for a growing hospitality team

Values and behaviour mapping, leadership reflection and practical culture rituals such as team huddles, recognition and onboarding buddies, so values hold up during everyday service pressure.

Worked with
Business leadership, leadership team and staff
What was delivered
The business's vision and values, then leader and staff workshops across multiple rounds of engagement

Cobb Lane Bakery

Amy Newman

Workplace culture · Client work

Alignment from ownership to regional teams

Work spanning the people who own, lead and deliver the service, so direction is shared across regional locations.

Worked with
Shareholders, CEO and board chair, staff across regional locations
What was delivered
Facilitated sessions across ownership, senior leadership and the broader staff group

Keystone Radiology

Leadership · Client work

Senior and sales leadership across two states

Facilitation for leaders and high-performing sales teams working across Victoria and Sydney.

Worked with
Executive leadership, sales leadership and top-tier sales teams
What was delivered
Facilitated work with senior leaders and sales teams in Victoria and Sydney

Gore Medical

Community · Client work

From board cohesion to organisation-wide implementation

A connected series that started with the board and carried through leaders and staff.

Worked with
Board, leaders and staff
What was delivered
Board cohesion facilitation, leadership workshops and implementation support across the organisation

Midsumma Festival

Luke and Sassy Scott laughing against a bright blue background

Media & creators · Client work

A thinking partner behind a growing creator brand

An ongoing retainer for content creators and media talent, moving from personal coaching to team culture design to day-to-day operations, so the business behind the content can keep pace with the audience.

Luke and Sassy Scott

Content creators, in partnership with Mushroom Connect

Clients & testimonials

The work, through their eyes.

More client voices
The capability workshops delivered by Emeli were transformational for our organisation. Her expertise in experience design ensured that every session was not only informative but also engaging. Our leadership team left with actionable insights that we could implement immediately.

Karen Bryant

CEO

Midsumma Festival

Read original
Emeli is truly a master facilitator of the human spirit. By creating a safe and trusted environment almost instantly, she allowed us to have authentic and real moments and quickly build intimacy as a team. Her natural wisdom paired with decades of experience result in a talent that is hard to come by. I couldn't recommend her more highly to organisations and teams looking to explore elusive yet crucial topics like inclusion, emotional intelligence and team connection.

Claire Pilley

The Difference, PwC

Read original
Project archive

Selected community, cultural, organisational and research projects.

Projects

A practice archive rather than a client list.

Each entry uses the same case study structure.

Filter the portfolio

Showing 19 of 19 projects

Department of Families, Fairness and Housing (DFFH) · Paving the Way Forward

Community of Practice & lived-experience workforce learning

Context
Facilitated cross-sector collaboration across government, service providers and community partners, alongside bespoke learning to help staff integrate lived experience into everyday practice. Network transition planning saw six partner organisations volunteer to host future sessions beyond initial program funding.
Emeli's role
Lead facilitation and learning design through SoCo.
Methods
Community of Practice facilitation, co-created workforce learning modules, participant workbooks and network transition planning
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Applied shared purpose, lived-experience learning and partner-led planning to cross-sector practice.
governmentfacilitationcommunitysocial cohesion

No More Shame

Regional community mapping, Robinvale and Mildura

Context
Community and stakeholder mapping across approximately six regional Victorian communities, with youth, family and Elder engagement.
Emeli's role
Community researcher, mapping lead and facilitator.
Methods
Community and stakeholder mapping, engagement with young people, families and Elders, identification of community strengths and service gaps.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Shaped the Locate and Map stages of Human Ecosystems Design, and the principle that community knowledge is legitimate evidence.
communityFirst Nationsyouthsocial cohesionresearch

Reach Foundation

First Nations and youth community practice

Context
Long-term practice across Alice Springs and Central Australia, the Northern Territory, Western Australia, South Australia and regional Victoria.
Emeli's role
Facilitator, program designer and facilitator developer.
Methods
Youth camps, school and community programs, Elder engagement, national parks-based learning, train-the-trainer and community-led adaptation.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Established repeat relationships as infrastructure and local capability over external dependency.
First Nationsyouthcommunityfacilitationleadership

Catholic Archdiocese

Reconciliation Action Plan processes and cultural capability

Context
Work across First Nations stakeholders, staff, executives and institutional gatekeepers.
Emeli's role
Facilitator, cultural capability practitioner and partnership builder.
Methods
Reconciliation Action Plan processes, cultural capability training, community engagement and staff facilitation.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Sharpened the distinction between consultation and shared authority, and between symbolic reconciliation and practical change.
First Nationsorganisational culturegovernancefacilitation

The Virtues Project International

Teacher development, Botswana and Namibia

Context
Educational program adaptation with local educators, including engagement concerning San communities and government systems.
Emeli's role
Facilitator and program adaptation practitioner.
Methods
Teacher development, culturally responsive implementation, co-determination of what translated and what required redesign.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Confirmed that imported solutions must become locally interpreted responses.
internationaleducationcommunity

Community placement, Northern Ireland

Post-conflict community learning, Belfast

Context
Approximately ten weeks of cultural and community learning across Falls Road and Protestant community contexts, with communities affected by the Troubles.
Emeli's role
Participant practitioner and community learner.
Methods
Immersive community learning across history, religion, identity, place and inherited conflict.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Reconciliation cannot be externally imposed.
internationalcommunitysocial cohesion

Experiential education program, upstate New York

Youth development with young people from the Bronx and Brooklyn

Context
Approximately three months of experiential education and youth development practice.
Emeli's role
Youth practitioner and facilitator.
Methods
Experiential education, belonging, confidence and participation, adapting programs to lived realities.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Programs must adapt to the lived realities of participants, not the reverse.
internationalyoutheducation

Midsumma

Research, evaluation and organisational practice

Methods
Participatory inquiry, qualitative synthesis and organisational learning.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed evidence-to-decision translation within cultural organisations.
researchfeminist practiceorganisational culturecultural systems

ILGA Oceania

Regional research and convening practice

Methods
Participatory inquiry, collective sensemaking and regional facilitation.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Strengthened Pacific relational practice within Human Ecosystems Design applications.
Pacific or Pasifikafeminist practiceresearchgovernance

Pacific Sexual and Gender Diversity Network

Pacific community and movement practice

Methods
Relational practice, leadership development and collective capability.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Shaped the Pacific and Pasifika community infrastructure application.
Pacific or Pasifikafeminist practiceleadershipcommunity

University of Melbourne

Collective Potential impact report

Methods
Qualitative synthesis, evidence-to-decision translation and evaluation framing.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Contributed to the research and evaluation capability grouping.
researcheducationgovernance

Keystone Radiology

Organisational culture and human systems

Methods
Organisational review, decision-making and ways of working design.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed the Workplace Culture, Values & Team Workshops application and 90-day implementation approach.
organisational culturegovernanceleadership

W. L. Gore

Organisational culture and human systems

Methods
Facilitation, culture and ways of working.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed practice on distributed authority and role clarity.
organisational cultureleadership

Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre

Organisational culture and human systems

Methods
Facilitation, leadership and team practice.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed large-workforce implementation practice.
organisational culturefacilitation

CareerSeekers

Organisational culture and inclusion practice

Methods
Facilitation and participatory practice.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed Restoring Dignity application development.
organisational culturecommunitysocial cohesion

Safe and Equal

Sector and organisational practice

Methods
Facilitation, participatory inquiry and organisational learning.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed feminist practice and repair capability.
feminist practiceorganisational culturegovernance

Medical Pantry

Organisational and social enterprise practice

Methods
Facilitation and systems practice.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Informed social enterprise application of Human Ecosystems Design.
organisational culturecommunity

ASHM

Research and evaluation practice

Methods
Participatory inquiry and evaluation framing.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Contributed to evaluation framework development.
researchgovernanceeducation

Birdcage

Women's leadership and feminist practice

Methods
Leadership retreats, facilitator development and participatory practice.
How it influenced Human Ecosystems Design
Shaped female facilitator development within Human Ecosystems Design capability building.
feminist practiceleadershipcommunity
Where the work applies

Workplace culture, community co-design and locally interpreted applications.

Applications

One method, interpreted differently in every setting.

Each application uses the same eight stages. What changes is the context, the authority structure, the cultural knowledge involved and what the community or organisation decides to build.

The method can travel. Culture, authority, language, ownership, history and knowledge remain specific to the people and place.

Experience & capability

The experience and capabilities behind the practice.

Experience

Experience organised by capability, not by employment history.

Emeli's role is not simply facilitation. She works as a human systems designer, participatory practitioner, community researcher, pracademic and cultural infrastructure strategist.

Domains of practice

Community development and social cohesion

Regional community mapping, service ecosystem work, youth and family engagement, Elder engagement and community-led program design.

First Nations engagement

Nearly two decades of practice across Central Australia, the Northern Territory, Western Australia, South Australia and regional Victoria, with repeat community relationships and facilitator development.

Youth leadership and experiential education

Camps, school programs, leadership pathways and experiential learning in Australia and internationally.

International and intercultural education

Northern Ireland, the United States, Botswana and Namibia, including teacher development and culturally responsive program adaptation.

Reconciliation and institutional practice

Reconciliation Action Plan processes, cultural capability programs and work across institutional gatekeeping and shared authority.

Organisational culture and human systems

Governance, decision-making, role clarity, meetings, accountability, ways of working and implementation across health, education, events, hospitality, social impact and professional services.

Feminist practice and gender and sexuality work

Women's leadership, female facilitator development, LGBTQIA+ organisational practice and Pacific and Pasifika feminist practice.

Research, evaluation and pracademic work

Participatory inquiry, qualitative synthesis, collective sensemaking, evaluation frameworks and evidence-to-decision translation.

How impact is considered

The measures used to understand change beyond activity.

Impact

An impact register that shows its working.

Measures the register can track

  • years in practice
  • communities engaged
  • countries worked in
  • facilitators trained
  • programs designed
  • workshops and learning experiences
  • participants engaged
  • long-term community relationships
  • funding attracted
  • pilots scaled
  • organisations supported
  • strategic plans developed
  • governance changes influenced
  • local leaders developed
  • programs transferred to communities
  • recommendations implemented
  • policy or funding decisions influenced
The model & design approach

Human Ecosystems Design, Human Infrastructure Design and the theory of change.

The Model

Human Ecosystems Design reads the system. Human Infrastructure Design builds what lasts.

Human Ecosystems Design helps communities and organisations understand how culture, relationships, identity, power, participation and institutional structures shape outcomes. Human Infrastructure Design provides the practical method for locating the work, mapping the system, gathering evidence, identifying patterns, co-designing responses, testing solutions, building capability and sustaining change.

A relational web, not a hierarchy

Every part of the practice shapes and is shaped by the others.

The practitioner, the infrastructure, the two design practices and the communities involved are held in relationship. Change moves in every direction.

Relationships are not soft. Relationships are infrastructure.
A relational web. Emeli Paulo, SoCo, Human Ecosystems Design, Human Infrastructure Design, communities and place, workplaces and teams, and applications and projects are each connected to every other part. There is no top or bottom.Emeli PauloSoCoHumanEcosystemsDesignHumanInfrastructureDesignCommunitiesand placeWorkplacesand teamsApplicationsand projects

Emeli Paulo

The practitioner. Human systems designer, participatory practitioner, community researcher and pracademic.

Select any part to see how it connects. Every part shapes and is shaped by the others.

Theory of change

Change the conditions. Change what's possible.

Too many programs try to change people while leaving the conditions producing the problem untouched.

  1. 01

    The problem

    Human potential is constrained by systems, cultures and conditions that exclude, disconnect or disempower people.

  2. 02

    The intervention

    Human Ecosystems Design: participatory research, cultural knowledge, co-design, facilitation, collective capability and shared infrastructure.

  3. 03

    Long-term impact

    More equitable, connected and resilient communities with greater collective capacity to shape their own futures.

Where change is felt

SystemsOrganisationsRelationshipsPeople

The critical assumption: when people have meaningful influence over decisions, access to resources, supportive relationships and opportunities to build capability, they are better able to sustain change together. This assumption is tested through the work, not simply asserted.

Human Ecosystems Design, stage by stage

Eight stages, adapted to context every time they are used.

An agnostic model, a specific practice

Sector-agnostic. Format-agnostic. Audience-agnostic.

Sector-agnostic

It can be applied across:

  • community development
  • education
  • workplaces
  • professional sport
  • music
  • arts and culture
  • youth development
  • reconciliation
  • social cohesion
  • health
  • wellbeing
  • public institutions
  • feminist movements
  • creator ecosystems
  • social enterprise
  • philanthropy

Format-agnostic

The work might take the form of:

  • research
  • community mapping
  • workshops
  • organisational reviews
  • cultural capability programs
  • academies
  • learning pathways
  • leadership programs
  • partnership frameworks
  • governance reform
  • online learning
  • public events
  • community networks
  • facilitator development
  • implementation planning
  • evaluation and learning

Audience-agnostic

The model can involve:

  • young people
  • Elders
  • community members
  • artists
  • athletes
  • teachers
  • cultural practitioners
  • executives
  • Boards
  • frontline staff
  • facilitators
  • service providers
  • funders
  • government stakeholders
  • movement leaders
  • creators
  • consultants

The method can travel. Culture, authority, language, ownership, history and knowledge remain specific to the people and place.

Shift statements

The Standard We Are Shifting

  1. Fixing peopleRedesigning conditions
  2. Facilitating workshopsDesigning human systems
  3. Stakeholder managementRelational systems practice
  4. ConsultationParticipation with influence
  5. RepresentationAuthority and shared power
  6. Cultural awarenessCultural stewardship
  7. Cultural competence as individual knowledgeCultural responsibility as a system
  8. Community stories as anecdotalLived experience as legitimate evidence
  9. One-off programsSustainable capability
  10. Extracting informationReciprocal learning
  11. Imported solutionsLocally interpreted responses
  12. Expert-led changeArchitectures of collaboration
  13. Diversity as numbersDignity, participation and power
  14. Values on paperBehaviours and operating systems
  15. Reporting activitiesDemonstrating change
  16. Relationships as softRelationships as infrastructure
  17. Avoiding conflictBuilding capacity for repair
  18. Founder-owned knowledgeStewarded and shared infrastructure
  19. Working for communitiesWorking with communities
  20. Universal deliveryContext-responsive implementation

What the model refuses

  • It does not treat culture as interchangeable across contexts.
  • It does not treat consultation as participation.
  • It does not treat community knowledge as free raw material.
  • It does not deliver standardised programs without local interpretation.
  • It does not leave a system dependent on the practitioner.
  • It does not report activity in place of change.

Connected roles in the ecosystem

Emeli Paulo
The practitioner. A human systems designer, participatory practitioner, community researcher, pracademic and cultural infrastructure strategist.
SoCo
The infrastructure. SoCo creates the structures, partnerships, governance and resourcing through which the work can be carried out and sustained.
Human Ecosystems Design
The lens. It examines how culture, relationships, identity, power, participation and institutional structures shape outcomes.
Human Infrastructure Design
The build. Designing the relationships, governance and ways of working that hold change in place, through adaptable practices that locate the work, map the system, gather evidence, identify patterns, co-design, test, build capability and sustain change.
Applications and Projects
Where the practice meets sector, format and audience: Workplace Culture, Values & Team Workshops, Community Co-design and cross-sector partnerships, always interpreted locally.

Core positioning

Human Ecosystems Design is a sector-agnostic, context-responsive and culturally situated human systems design model.

The model is sector-agnostic in application, but culturally specific in practice.

Emeli spent more than 25 years working across communities, cultures and institutions. Through that work, she learnt that sustainable change does not come from fixing individuals or delivering standardised programs. It comes from understanding relationships, culture, power, participation and place, then redesigning the conditions through which people can act together.

SoCo creates the infrastructure for that work. Human Ecosystems Design reads the system. Human Infrastructure Design builds what holds change in place.

The central problem

Too many programs try to change people while leaving the conditions producing the problem untouched.
  • Communities are consulted but not given authority.
  • Lived experience is collected but not treated as evidence.
  • Cultural knowledge is welcomed symbolically but excluded from decisions.
  • Standardised programs are transferred without adapting to culture, history or place.
  • One-off workshops replace long-term capability.
  • Relationships are treated as soft while structures and power remain unchanged.
  • Under-represented people carry invisible cultural and emotional labour.
  • Organisations talk about inclusion while retaining institutional gatekeeping.
  • Funding and services are often delivered transactionally rather than relationally.

Theory of Change

How the practice produces change, stated plainly.

This is the social-impact logic behind the work. It is written so partners, funders and communities can hold the practice to account against it.

The chain

Stage 1

Starting conditions

  • fragmented relationships
  • limited participation
  • unequal authority
  • cultural blind spots
  • exclusion
  • under-resourcing
  • weak accountability
  • isolated programs
  • low trust
  • knowledge extraction

Stage 2

Activities

  • locate
  • map
  • listen
  • identify patterns
  • form hypotheses
  • co-design
  • test
  • build capability
  • steward and repair

Stage 3

Outputs

  • cultural and stakeholder maps
  • evidence synthesis
  • findings and hypotheses
  • co-designed programs
  • partnership frameworks
  • cultural safeguards
  • governance recommendations
  • learning programs
  • facilitator development
  • implementation plans
  • evaluation frameworks

Stage 4

Near-term outcomes

  • greater participation
  • stronger trust
  • clearer authority
  • improved relationships
  • culturally safer practice
  • stronger local capability
  • more credible partnerships
  • better organisational decisions
  • increased access to resources

Stage 5

Long-term impact

  • restored dignity
  • stronger community authority
  • sustainable collective capability
  • more adaptive institutions
  • improved social cohesion
  • reduced cultural harm
  • community-led systems change
  • relationships that continue beyond a program
  • infrastructure through which people can act together

Assumptions the model makes

  • Communities already hold significant knowledge, capability and strength.
  • Authority must move, not just attention.
  • Capability transfer is a design requirement, not a closing activity.
  • Cultural practitioners are paid for cultural work.
  • Harm will occur, so repair capability must be built in advance.
  • Evidence includes lived experience alongside organisational data.
Origins, cultural lenses & governance

The relationships, cultural care and governance that shape the work.

Origins

Human Ecosystems Design did not begin as a framework. It began as practice.

This is a practice timeline rather than a résumé. Each period shows what Emeli experienced, what she learnt and how that learning shaped the model.

RMIT Design Futures

Practice First. Theory Added Language.

Emeli's postgraduate study in Design Futures at RMIT provided additional language, theory and design architecture for practices she had already been developing through community work.

Where the study connects

  • design futures
  • participatory design
  • systems thinking
  • experience design
  • intersectional design
  • relational design
  • collaborative inquiry
  • prototyping
  • designing for complexity
  • future-facing organisational design
Decades of practice gave Emeli the knowledge. Design Futures helped her recognise, connect and formalise it.

Cultural Lenses

Learning from cultural knowledge without claiming it.

This page is explicit about authority, ownership and boundaries. Cultural knowledge referenced here belongs to the communities, custodians and practitioners it comes from.

First Nations practice and Human Ecosystems Design

Human Ecosystems Design does not claim or replicate First Nations methodologies. Emeli's long-term work alongside First Nations communities taught her the importance of listening before designing, community authority, place, relationships, cultural knowledge, reciprocity, capability and accountability.

Lessons carried into the practice

  • Elders and community leaders are authorities, not simply stakeholders.
  • Trust must be earned.
  • Place and history matter.
  • Programs must be locally adapted.
  • Community knowledge is legitimate evidence.
  • Wellbeing is relational.
  • Local capability matters more than external dependency.
  • Symbolic participation is not shared authority.
  • Practitioners must remain accountable for their own assumptions and power.

Pacific relational knowledge and vā

Across many Pacific cultures, vā provides a relational understanding of the space connecting people, families, communities, ancestors, culture, institutions and place. That relational space carries responsibility and must be nurtured, respected, maintained and repaired.

Human Ecosystems Design is not based on vā and does not claim ownership of Pacific relational knowledge. Pacific concepts such as vā provide an important relational lens through which aspects of Human Ecosystems Design can be understood and applied.

Vā and Pacific relational knowledge

  • explains why relationships carry collective responsibility
  • focuses on nurturing relational space
  • grounds knowledge in culture, genealogy and place
  • understands knowledge relationally
  • recognises relational harm
  • requires cultural stewardship

Human Ecosystems Design

  • examines the conditions shaping relationships
  • maps governance, participation and systems
  • provides an adaptable design process
  • connects lived knowledge to organisational action
  • examines relational and structural repair
  • develops implementation and accountability structures

What relationships matter, what conditions are shaping them, and what must be nurtured, redesigned or repaired so people can participate with dignity?

Cultural cartography

Mapping culture, authority and relationship with the people who hold them.

Cultural cartography is acknowledged as a contribution of Mat Rua. Where it is used within Human Ecosystems Design work, cultural interpretation remains with appropriate cultural knowledge holders.

  • cultural identities
  • relationships
  • whakapapa and inherited knowledge
  • cultural authority
  • institutional power
  • cultural strengths
  • cultural risks
  • gatekeepers
  • knowledge boundaries
  • cultural labour
  • participation
  • places of harm, safety and belonging

Māori, Pacific and First Nations cultural knowledge is not presented as SoCo-owned intellectual property. Interpretation, authority and ownership stay with the relevant cultural knowledge holders.

Cultural stewardship

Stewardship is a set of obligations, not a statement of values.

  • caring for relationships
  • protecting cultural knowledge
  • paying cultural practitioners
  • establishing consent
  • respecting knowledge boundaries
  • creating accountability
  • supporting cultural authority
  • preventing extraction
  • repairing harm
  • maintaining long-term relationships
Cultural knowledge is not raw material for a consultancy product.

IP and Cultural Governance

Ownership stated before the work begins.

Governance is part of the method. Consent, attribution, payment and withdrawal are agreed at the start of a partnership rather than negotiated after publication.

SoCo IP

May include:

  • Human Ecosystems Design process
  • human systems framework
  • observation and pattern methodology
  • facilitation structures
  • implementation frameworks
  • organisational design tools

Cultural practitioner IP

Remains with the relevant practitioner or cultural custodian. Contribution is attributed and paid. Interpretation stays with the knowledge holder.

Community knowledge

Community-contributed knowledge does not automatically become SoCo intellectual property.

Protocols should address

  • consent
  • attribution
  • ownership
  • use
  • access
  • storage
  • payment
  • publication
  • withdrawal
  • cultural restrictions
Cultural knowledge is not raw material for a consultancy product.

Let’s find common ground.

No sales pitch. Just humans finding common ground. If I’m not the right person for what you need, we can explore other consultants within SoCo Collective (opens in a new tab).